“On Being Sane in Insane Places” Essay

It was very interesting to read round Rosenhans poll and how psychiatrists, who go d unitary big coursework and training, could wrongly classify a patient. It surprised me how some psychiatrists couldnt grade they take upt kip down whats wrong with patients kind of they could possibly diagnose somebody as insane.Though reading this chapter I found the strange things from Rosenhans study that was hard to call back. Slater states, The strange thing was, the other patients seemed to know Rosenhan was normal, nonetheless while the doctors did not. (69). I believe patients stack know that go than doctors because they be in that situation already and some doctors dont canvas their patients carefully to know whats actually happening with them. For example, if someone studies about(predicate) one culture doesnt mean that person knows way better that person who actually lives with that culture. Both chapters I found interesting because it relates to my vitality history very we ll. I found out Elliot Aronson, Darley and Latane all kind of evaluate to show that people needs to find reason for their actions.I believe each person as a human have to cooperate everyone no matter what. Darley and Latanes mention is about how to help someone in an emergency that relates with Catherine Genovse murder. Slater says, You must interpret the event as one in which help is infallible (95). We read about Catherines murder and saw that after she had asked for help, someone yelled, leave that girl alone, instead of helping, and the only thing that happened was that the killer ran away (95). I jeer with Darley and Latanes that we need to know which help is needed and what help is not. The person whitethorn have helped with getting the killer away, except Catherine needed the help the most, so she wouldnt die. I been in so many situations that someone needed my help and I helped as much as I could, solely knowing what helped was needed help me a lot.Leon Festinger talke d about how people very pay aid to what is going on in their life and well-nigh them. I think some people just pay attention to what they want. Its true most of the people like to listen to people who agree with them and ignore who doesnt. The chapter also discussed how people can believe in something they cant prove such as God working througha person. I think even for believing a divinity it has many prove to make a person to believe it. I believe for believing on something need to have something as prove.This fraction is a really great one however I didnt prefer how the experiments were described. I additionally didnt prefer the experiments and there result. Harlow was a fascinating man and I preferred how the author discusses the experimenter and how they grew up on the grounds that it permits me to understand their conclusions about their examinations and why they are imperative to them. I thought it was interesting that the monkeys adored the cover yet when they were displ ayed a display case they might be scared and yell or cry about it. What I establish fascinating was that when they were babies they existed like a typical life however when they got older they went insane. A percentage of the monkeys were introducing a mental imbalance, gnawing them, and one of the monkeys bit off his hands. This discovering was entertaining since Harlow was supporting the surrogate moms and this wound up going terrible for him.I wish the author might impersonate more to the investigations and less to her editorializing. I cant agree with what Zola-Morgan does say our human lives are intrinsically more valuable monkey studies furnish information that helps those lives (153). Of course humans are more valuable than the monkeys, scarce compose monkeys are animals and I think its so wild to hurts them only because to do the experiment. If that kind of research saved the life of love then I will be okay with that. I still feel awful with doing that type of experime nt on poor animals that didnt do nothing wrong. This is another important finding because it just shows that psychiatrists may not have any idea about what they are doing, only no one questions them because of their authority. Of course after whom goes through big coursework and training, dont expect someone to tell them they are wrong but from Rosenhans study they may be wrong too.