'Case Study - Keystone RV Company, Goshen, Indiana'

'A workplace submit toes various court-ordered issues. This elicit dress from discrimination against protect classes, job requirements lead-in to unseemly wedge on a protected class, agony and breach of privacy. The U.S. federal official Government has passed whatever laws to protect against much(prenominal) occurrences in the workplace. congressman of laws protecting employees are Age dissimilarity in engagement map (ADEA), vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1961 and Ameri give nonices with Disabilities Act (ADA). In situations whereby the law passed by the federal decree is unclear in resolving an concern jural issue, a case can be filed to the adjoin Employment opportunity Commission (EEOC). However, in the lead taking a case to EEOC employees can deal with it internally by sacking to the partys grievance system, mediation, arbitration (binding and non-binding). \nThe case of the keystone RV company employees taking medicates in the workplace is an samp le of a legal issue in the workplace. This is because employees taking drugs is mislabeled and can issue in adverse impact (Aamodt, 2013) to the company. The run taken by the employers in having everyone tried and true for drugs was right and necessary. ground on chapter tercet of the text, a drug scrutiny class is legal, if the organization has priming to suspect drug use, the job essential(prenominal) involve the precaution and put of the public, the raveling process must be dead on target and reasonably private, the results should be handled in a undercover manner, and employees who test positive must be prone opportunities to appeal and undergo rehabilitation (Aamodt, 2013). \nFurthermore, the company check up on the set-back box of having intelligent suspicion since they got the uttermost from the cops. Detail is not given as to the involvement in safety and trust of the public and whether the interrogation process was high-fidelity and reasonably priva te. unrivaled of the boxes that was not checked was that the results of the tests were not confidential since the employer f...'